A Framework for Happiness

Derived from the YouTube series by Will Schoder ( @schodes ):


Emotional State Theory (EST)

The sources offer a comprehensive view of happiness, primarily defining it through Dan Haybron's Emotional State Theory (EST) and identifying five foundational conditions—the SOARS model—that lead to lasting fulfillment.

The adopted definition of happiness is an emotional condition consisting of three dimensions of central affective states and one's underlying mood propensity. This approach moves beyond simple transient pleasure to provide a pragmatic framework for understanding true happiness.

Core Components of the Emotional Condition

  1. Attunement (The Foundation):
  2. Engagement:
  3. Endorsement:
  4. Mood Propensity:

A life that is psychically affirming is one where the emotional condition is favorable across all dimensions, with psychic flourishing being an even more pronounced state of harmony.


Theories of Happiness

EST is defined in opposition to two other popular philosophical concepts:

Hedonism

Defines happiness as a positive balance of pleasant over unpleasant experiences. EST rejects this, arguing that pleasure is often superficial and doesn't reach deep enough to be a true constituent of happiness (e.g., excluding peripheral affects like an orgasm).

Life Satisfaction Theory (LST)

Defines happiness as an intellectual endorsement or wholehearted affirmation of one's life. EST highlights the problem of cognitive affective divergence, where one's intellectual judgment (satisfaction) can diverge significantly from their actual emotional state (happiness). For example, money often buys life satisfaction but not necessarily emotional happiness.


Lasting Happiness: The SOARS Model

These five conditions are resistant to hedonic adaptation (the hedonic treadmill) and thus bring lasting happiness by supporting the dimensions of Emotional State Theory, particularly Attunement.

  1. Security (S):
  2. Outlook (O):
  3. Autonomy (A):
  4. Relationships (R):
  5. Skilled and Meaningful Work (S):

Congruence and Well-being

Emotional State Theory (EST)

Dan Haybron's Emotional State Theory (EST) serves as the working definition of happiness. It posits that happiness is an emotional condition comprised of three dimensions of central affective states and an underlying mood propensity, moving beyond simpler notions like mere pleasure.

Central Affective States

The three core dimensions constituting the emotional condition of happiness are Attunement, Engagement, and Endorsement:

  1. Attunement (The Foundation):
  2. Engagement:
  3. Endorsement:

Mood Propensity

Happiness includes one's mood propensity—the underlying tendency to fall into certain moods. It is psychologically deeper than any temporary mood or emotion.

Levels of Happiness according to EST

Larger Context of Happiness

EST vs. Other Theories

Life Satisfaction Theory (LST)

EST highlights the problem of cognitive affective divergence, where intellectual judgments (satisfaction) can diverge significantly from the affective state (happiness). Money, for example, often buys LST but not emotional happiness.

Hedonism

EST objects that pleasure is superficial and excludes peripheral affects (like an orgasm) from being constituents of happiness. For EST, happiness is the quality of one's entire psychological disposition, not just the pleasantness of conscious experience.

Connection to Foundations and Congruence

In essence, EST provides the framework for understanding the internal psychological experience of happiness, while the SOARS foundations and congruence explain the external and internal conditions necessary to sustain that emotional state.


Heritability and Foundations

The sources draw upon scientific studies in psychology and neuroscience to establish the definition of happiness, support the SOARS framework, and critique conventional assumptions about well-being.

Heritability of Happiness

Twin Studies and Affective Style

Hedonic Adaptation

A significant body of research explains why temporary pursuits fail to bring lasting happiness:

Psychological Theories

Self-Determination Theory (SDT)

Key Research Models and Contributors

Research Findings

Caveats and Limitations


Addressing Hedonic Adaptation

The SOARS model (Security, Outlook, Autonomy, Relationships, Skilled and Meaningful Work) identifies the foundations of lasting happiness. These five conditions are crucial because they are generally not subject to hedonic adaptation, differentiating them from transient pleasures.

The SOARS elements are defined as the conditions that, when satisfied, move an individual up in their genetically determined set range of happiness. They are the non-adaptive inputs that fulfill the fundamental psychological requirements for robust psychic affirmation (happiness).

Note: The last three elements (A, R, S) align directly with the universal psychological needs of Self-Determination Theory (SDT).

Five Foundations of Happiness (SOARS)

1. Security (S)

Security is a deficit need—it primarily affects happiness only when lacking. It is the perception of security that matters.

2. Outlook (O)

Outlook concerns one’s beliefs, values, and how situations are perceived and interpreted. The nature of the mind (outlook) is seen as the most important factor for happiness.

3. Autonomy (A)

The feeling that one's actions are fully self-endorsed (volitional) rather than controlled or coerced. Not the same as independence or having many options.

4. Relationships (R)

Relatedness is widely considered the greatest predictor of happiness.

5. Skilled and Meaningful Work (S)

This foundation aligns with the psychological need for competence.

SOARS in Context

SOARS and Emotional State Theory (EST)

The SOARS foundations are intrinsically linked to the three dimensions of EST (Attunement, Engagement, Endorsement):

SOARS and Congruence

Congruence (harmony across a person's physical, psychological, and socio-cultural levels) is the most important overarching concept.


Misconceptions and Challenges

The sources identify pervasive misconceptions that hinder lasting happiness, often contrasting them with Emotional State Theory (EST) and the SOARS framework.

Misconceptions About Happiness

Happiness as Transient Pleasure (Hedonism)

Happiness as Intellectual Endorsement (Life Satisfaction Theory - LST)

The Pursuit of Happiness

Internal and Psychological Hurdles

Societal and Environmental Hurdles

The conclusion is that robust psychic affirmation—a state where life is "predominantly congruent"—requires navigating these powerful misconceptions and environmental challenges, as happiness is a substantial part of well-being.


Happiness vs. Well-being

The sources establish a clear distinction between Happiness (a psychological state) and Well-being (an evaluative concept of a life that goes well). While separate, happiness is ultimately argued to be a substantial and integral part of overall well-being.

The Core Definitions

Happiness is Not the Ultimate Good

The philosophical position that happiness is not the *ultimate good* is acknowledged through arguments and thought experiments that elevate moral integrity and life fulfillment over mere pleasure:

A Substantial Component of Well-being

Despite acknowledging happiness's limitations as the *sole* measure of a good life, the sources conclude it remains a crucial element:

Congruence: The Merging Point

The concept of Congruence ties happiness and well-being together by describing a cross-level coherence in a person's life—a state of harmony across physical, psychological, and socio-cultural levels unified by purpose.

In conclusion, the happiness defined by EST and achieved through congruence is deeply intertwined with the pursuit of a virtuous, purposeful, and psychologically sound life, making it an integral element of well-being.


Cultivating Lasting Happiness

The primary method for cultivating lasting happiness is to concentrate on the SOARS foundations, defined as those conditions that are not subject to hedonic adaptation (the hedonic treadmill). Cultivating happiness requires deliberate, sustained effort on these five essential areas:

1. The Foundation: Focusing on Non-Adaptive Conditions (SOARS)

S: Security (A Deficit Need)

O: Outlook (The Most Important Factor)

Outlook (one's interpretations, beliefs, and focus) is the most important factor because everything falls to the level of perception.

A: Autonomy (Volitional Action)

R: Relationships (Greatest Predictor)

S: Skilled and Meaningful Work (Competence)

2. The Context: Congruence and Holistic Alignment

Cultivating happiness ultimately means striving for congruence—a state of agreement or harmony across a person’s physical, psychological, and socio-cultural levels, unified by purpose.

3. The Challenge: Effort and Environment


The Environment's Influence

The sources emphasize that social and environmental factors play a crucial, interdependent role in cultivating happiness. These external conditions directly influence an individual's security, psychological needs (Autonomy, Relatedness, Competence), and overall state of congruence.

Environmental Impact on the SOARS Foundations

Societal and Cultural Compression

Social and cultural environments pose a direct threat to the Attunement dimension of happiness, specifically by causing compression—the narrowing of the mind and spirit—which "smothers" one's capacity for pleasure.

The Role of Society in Fulfilling Needs (Congruence)

Communal environments are essential for achieving congruence (harmony across physical, psychological, and socio-cultural levels).

The Balance of Individual Effort and Environment

Happiness is not strictly an individual pursuit; human lives are "deeply intertwined with others in almost every domain."


Regrets of the Dying

The Five Regrets of the Dying, compiled by palliative care nurse Bronnie Ware, serve as a powerful lens through which to discuss why humans often fail to achieve true happiness and psychological flourishing during their lives. These regrets highlight the conflict between societal pressures and authentic living.

The List of Regrets

  1. I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.
  2. I wish I hadn't worked so hard.
  3. I wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings.
  4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.
  5. I wish that I had let myself be happier.

Regrets within the Happiness Framework

These regrets are directly connected to failures in satisfying the core foundations of lasting happiness, particularly the SOARS model (Security, Outlook, Autonomy, Relationships, Skilled Work) and the importance of Congruence.

Regrets and the SOARS Foundations

Regret 5: The Challenge of Postponed Happiness

The fifth regret—"I wish that I had let myself be happier"—is striking because it implies happiness was perceived as something that could have been allowed or chosen in the present but was perpetually deferred.

The profound lesson is that people frequently postpone psychological well-being while chasing future achievements. If we do not flourish psychologically on our way to future goals, we do not flourish at all.

Connection to Congruence

The concept of congruence (a state of harmony across a person's physical, psychological, and socio-cultural levels) provides a unified explanation for all the regrets: